K Sivaramakrishnan, ‘Situating the Subaltern: History and Anthropology in the Subaltern Studies Project’, in David Ludden (ed), Reading Subaltern Studies: Critical History, Contested Meaning and the Globalization of South Asia, London: Anthem, 2002, p 234.ħ. Dipesh Chakrabarty, ‘Subaltern Studies and Postcolonial Historiography’, Nepantla: Views from South 1(1), 2000, pp 9–32.Ħ.
Joseph A Buttigieg, ‘Sulla Categoria Gramsciana di “Subalterni”’, Critica marxista 1, 1998, pp 55–62.ĥ. Guha, ‘Preface’, in Subaltern Studies I, p vii.Ĥ.
Prison notebooks series#
Guha acted as the principal editor of the series from 1982 to 1988 and edited the fist six volumes.ģ. To date, the Subaltern Studies Editorial Collective has published 12 volumes of Subaltern Studies. Ranajit Guha, ‘Preface’, in Ranajit Guha (ed), Subaltern Studies I: Writings on South Asian History and Society, Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1982, p vii. Ranajit Guha, ‘Gramsci in India: Homage to a Teacher’, Journal of Modern Italian Studies 16(2), 2011, pp 288–295.Ģ.
Overall, the article provides avenues to rethink contemporary relations of subordination, marginality, and subalternity from a Gramscian perspective.ġ. In contrast to the current literature, this article attempts to show that Gramsci's concept of the subaltern is more complex than often recognized and that his analysis of subalternity relates to the function of intellectuals, constructions of identity and otherness, historiography, representation, the national popular, coloniality, and political organization. For Gramsci, subalternity is constituted through constructions of identity, otherness, and marginality that are reinforced within an ensemble of social, political, and economic relations. The article shows that Gramsci's concept of the subaltern is not limited to class relations and that in fact subalternity in the Gramscian sense encompasses an intersectionality of race, class, gender, and religion. Finally, through an examination of several notes in Notebook 25, the article provides an extrapolation of Gramsci's concept of subalternity. History of Subaltern Social Groups’-the article demonstrates that there is no textual evidence to support the censorship thesis. Then, through an exegesis of Notebook 25-the thematically organized ‘special notebook’ entitled ‘On the Margins of History.
The article first demonstrates how the diffusion of the ‘subaltern censorship thesis’ has limited current interpretations of Gramsci's concept of the subaltern to strictly class terms.
Prison notebooks code#
Through a philological analysis of Gramsci's complete Prison Notebooks, the article puts into question the widespread (mis)interpretation in subaltern studies and postcolonial literature that Gramsci developed the phrase ‘subaltern social groups’ as code for the word ‘proletariat’ in his Prison Notebooks in order to deceive prison censors. This article attempts to provide a new reading of Antonio Gramsci's concept of subaltern social groups.
0 kommentar(er)
